~ 18 November 2005 ~

The Scientist as Priest

The Acton Institute’s Powerblog points to interview with University of Georgia communication professor Thomas Lessl, who notes that:

…scientific culture has responded to the pressures of patronage by trying to construct a priestly ethos — by suggesting that it is the singular mediator of knowledge, or at least of whatever knowledge has real value, and should therefore enjoy a commensurate authority. If it could get the public to believe this, its power would vastly increase.”

I think most would agree that science is a means for acquiring knowledge. If you’re bound by a naturalistic view of the world, it quickly becomes the only arbiter of knowledge.

As the sole means of knowledge, the scientist takes on a priestly role, which would fit well with Le Sabot Post-Moderne’s assertion that the treatment of the Inteligent Design movement by many evolutionists is akin to branding them heretics.

Perhaps I’ll revisit this in my promised upcoming post on knowledge…

Posted by Jared Bridges | | Print This Print This

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Trackback: Le Sabot Post-Moderne on November 18, 2005

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.


»

© 2003-2016 Jared Bridges